One of the lasting legacies of RWC 2019 in Japan is, one would hope, the recognition that so-called tier 2 nations need to be exposed to a higher standard of rugby on a more regular basis.
This follows the series of remarkable performances by host nation Japan who defeated both Ireland and Scotland in the pool stages before finally succumbing to eventual champions South Africa in the quarter finals.
Quite rightly there have been noises from both the Six Nations and the Rugby Championship about inviting Japan to join their competition.
But it seems that the thinking has progressed beyond merely rewarding Japan.
Earlier this year World Rugby proposed launching a global “Nations Championship” consisting of a league of 12 teams playing each other once each year with semi-finals and a final to be held in the northern hemisphere in December and with promotion and relegation to and from the league.
Rather short-sightedly I labelled the proposal a “crap idea” owing to the extra burden it would put on already overworked players and, lo and behold, the proposal was duly abandoned – not, I hasten to add, owing to player welfare concerns, but because certain northern hemisphere unions refused to countenance the risk of relegation.
Now, however, talk of a world championship series is back on the table, with a seemingly less demanding playing schedule, involving the Six Nations and Rugby Championship teams plus Japan and Fiji.
All good, one might think, if it creates more opportunities for the leading nations to play one another and establishes a more coherent international calendar.
The crucial difference to the previous proposal, however, is that the competition would be ring-fenced, excluding the likes of Georgia, USA, Samoa and Tonga – which is hardly going to improve the lot of tier 2 nations in general.
So in other words, plenty of extra revenue for the top table, while the rest continue feed off the crumbs…